Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,787,777 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 43.9%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Trinidadian and Tobagonian	Immigrants from China
Minimum	3.9%	1.1%
Maximum	100.0%	24.4%
Range	96.1%	23.3%
Mean	21.4%	12.0%
Median	18.2%	11.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.4%	8.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	24.9%	14.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.4%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	14.4%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	14.3%	4.7%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guyana (19.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Guyanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (19.2%, a difference of 0.34%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Potawatomi	0.3 /100 \| #249	Tragic 19.2%
Cape Verdeans	0.3 /100 \| #250	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.3 /100 \| #251	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.3 /100 \| #252	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.3 /100 \| #253	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.3 /100 \| #254	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%