Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Local Government Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Omaha

0.0%
10.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Omaha, NE

Zip Code % Local Government Employees vs State vs National
1.681358.0%7.6%(+0.446)#2977.2%(+0.790)#13,131
2.681167.9%7.6%(+0.363)#3047.2%(+0.707)#13,376
3.681107.6%7.6%(+0.029)#3247.2%(+0.373)#14,431
4.681227.2%7.6%(-0.365)#3507.2%(-0.021)#15,672
5.681127.2%7.6%(-0.408)#3547.2%(-0.064)#15,800
6.681046.9%7.6%(-0.626)#3687.2%(-0.282)#16,543
7.681366.8%7.6%(-0.727)#3767.2%(-0.383)#16,908
8.681546.8%7.6%(-0.740)#3787.2%(-0.396)#16,964
9.681326.5%7.6%(-1.04)#3917.2%(-0.701)#18,029
10.681276.5%7.6%(-1.06)#3927.2%(-0.716)#18,092
11.681346.5%7.6%(-1.12)#3957.2%(-0.772)#18,261
12.681186.1%7.6%(-1.52)#4137.2%(-1.18)#19,618
13.681146.0%7.6%(-1.54)#4147.2%(-1.19)#19,672
14.681645.8%7.6%(-1.77)#4227.2%(-1.42)#20,432
15.681065.8%7.6%(-1.79)#4237.2%(-1.45)#20,526
16.681245.7%7.6%(-1.82)#4267.2%(-1.48)#20,634
17.681575.7%7.6%(-1.89)#4287.2%(-1.54)#20,852
18.681385.6%7.6%(-1.96)#4317.2%(-1.61)#21,078
19.681115.5%7.6%(-2.10)#4377.2%(-1.75)#21,574
20.681175.3%7.6%(-2.26)#4447.2%(-1.92)#22,111
21.681525.1%7.6%(-2.48)#4497.2%(-2.14)#22,762
22.681305.0%7.6%(-2.53)#4507.2%(-2.19)#22,921
23.681085.0%7.6%(-2.54)#4517.2%(-2.19)#22,948
24.681444.7%7.6%(-2.84)#4647.2%(-2.50)#23,804
25.681374.5%7.6%(-3.02)#4717.2%(-2.68)#24,295
26.681424.5%7.6%(-3.04)#4727.2%(-2.70)#24,352
27.681054.0%7.6%(-3.62)#4937.2%(-3.28)#25,816
28.681073.8%7.6%(-3.73)#5017.2%(-3.38)#26,042
29.681023.2%7.6%(-4.34)#5167.2%(-4.00)#27,182
30.681823.2%7.6%(-4.35)#5177.2%(-4.00)#27,188
31.681312.2%7.6%(-5.37)#5347.2%(-5.02)#28,520
32.681781.4%7.6%(-6.20)#5437.2%(-5.86)#29,211

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Omaha, NE are:
#1
8.0%
#2
7.9%
#3
7.6%
#4
7.2%
#5
7.2%
#6
6.9%
#7
6.8%
#8
6.8%
#9
6.5%
#10
6.5%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Omaha, NE?
68135 has the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Omaha, NE with 8.0%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in Omaha, NE?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in Omaha is 5.7%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in Nebraska?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in Nebraska is 7.6%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States is 7.2%.