Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha

60.0%
0.0%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1.681300.70%12.1%(-11.4)#417.0%(-16.3)#151
2.681361.1%12.1%(-11.0)#1017.0%(-15.9)#402
3.681061.8%12.1%(-10.3)#2317.0%(-15.2)#900
4.681162.1%12.1%(-9.97)#2917.0%(-14.9)#1,175
5.681352.4%12.1%(-9.72)#3417.0%(-14.6)#1,381
6.681383.0%12.1%(-9.12)#4317.0%(-14.0)#1,891
7.681223.8%12.1%(-8.33)#5917.0%(-13.2)#2,572
8.681524.2%12.1%(-7.87)#7217.0%(-12.8)#2,986
9.681374.4%12.1%(-7.69)#7517.0%(-12.6)#3,149
10.681145.3%12.1%(-6.76)#9217.0%(-11.6)#3,989
11.681645.8%12.1%(-6.34)#9817.0%(-11.2)#4,362
12.681326.9%12.1%(-5.16)#11517.0%(-10.0)#5,336
13.681547.8%12.1%(-4.28)#12717.0%(-9.17)#6,137
14.6814410.5%12.1%(-1.60)#16717.0%(-6.49)#8,224
15.6812411.1%12.1%(-0.979)#17817.0%(-5.86)#8,662
16.6815712.2%12.1%(+0.061)#19417.0%(-4.82)#9,418
17.6811713.4%12.1%(+1.36)#21217.0%(-3.53)#10,304
18.6812715.7%12.1%(+3.58)#23017.0%(-1.30)#11,781
19.6813416.9%12.1%(+4.76)#24517.0%(-0.125)#12,501
20.6810221.1%12.1%(+9.02)#26917.0%(+4.14)#14,802
21.6810721.4%12.1%(+9.29)#27117.0%(+4.41)#14,925
22.6811221.8%12.1%(+9.71)#27417.0%(+4.82)#15,141
23.6810422.0%12.1%(+9.86)#27517.0%(+4.98)#15,220
24.6810828.3%12.1%(+16.2)#31217.0%(+11.4)#17,835
25.6810531.5%12.1%(+19.4)#32417.0%(+14.6)#18,801
26.6811041.5%12.1%(+29.4)#34417.0%(+24.6)#21,007
27.6813148.0%12.1%(+35.9)#35017.0%(+31.0)#21,831
28.6811153.5%12.1%(+41.5)#35717.0%(+36.6)#22,384

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE are:
#1
0.0%
#2
0.0%
#3
0.0%
#4
0.70%
#5
1.1%
#6
1.8%
#7
2.1%
#8
2.4%
#9
3.0%
#10
3.8%
What zip code has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE?
68130 has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE with 0.70%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha is 16.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska is 12.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.