Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 25-34
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Omaha

3.0%
43.1%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 68110 43.1% 12.4% (+30.7)#32 14.5% (+28.6)#2,300
2. 68111 42.7% 12.4% (+30.2)#34 14.5% (+28.2)#2,364
3. 68108 36.1% 12.4% (+23.7)#43 14.5% (+21.6)#3,336
4. 68131 26.8% 12.4% (+14.4)#70 14.5% (+12.3)#5,756
5. 68134 25.6% 12.4% (+13.2)#74 14.5% (+11.1)#6,148
6. 68104 21.2% 12.4% (+8.78)#101 14.5% (+6.73)#8,074
7. 68105 21.1% 12.4% (+8.64)#103 14.5% (+6.59)#8,156
8. 68117 20.6% 12.4% (+8.14)#108 14.5% (+6.09)#8,441
9. 68107 18.9% 12.4% (+6.50)#123 14.5% (+4.45)#9,410
10. 68102 18.0% 12.4% (+5.60)#136 14.5% (+3.55)#9,965
11. 68112 14.2% 12.4% (+1.80)#164 14.5% (-0.250)#12,558
12. 68157 13.4% 12.4% (+0.949)#176 14.5% (-1.10)#13,181
13. 68132 10.1% 12.4% (-2.34)#210 14.5% (-4.39)#15,897
14. 68144 9.0% 12.4% (-3.42)#229 14.5% (-5.47)#16,916
15. 68127 9.0% 12.4% (-3.47)#231 14.5% (-5.52)#16,970
16. 68124 8.0% 12.4% (-4.49)#244 14.5% (-6.54)#17,898
17. 68114 7.8% 12.4% (-4.69)#247 14.5% (-6.74)#18,058
18. 68116 5.5% 12.4% (-6.93)#278 14.5% (-8.98)#20,129
19. 68137 4.6% 12.4% (-7.87)#294 14.5% (-9.92)#20,954
20. 68138 4.3% 12.4% (-8.11)#299 14.5% (-10.2)#21,182
21. 68164 4.1% 12.4% (-8.30)#303 14.5% (-10.3)#21,325
22. 68106 3.9% 12.4% (-8.53)#308 14.5% (-10.6)#21,521
23. 68154 3.6% 12.4% (-8.82)#311 14.5% (-10.9)#21,748
24. 68130 3.1% 12.4% (-9.30)#317 14.5% (-11.3)#22,068
25. 68135 3.1% 12.4% (-9.32)#318 14.5% (-11.4)#22,075
26. 68152 3.0% 12.4% (-9.43)#323 14.5% (-11.5)#22,164

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Omaha, NE are:
#1
43.1%
#2
42.7%
#3
36.1%
#4
26.8%
#5
25.6%
#6
21.2%
#7
21.1%
#8
20.6%
#9
18.9%
#10
18.0%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Omaha, NE?
68110 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Omaha, NE with 43.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Omaha, NE?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Omaha is 15.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Nebraska is 12.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States is 14.5%.