Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Married Couple
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha

20.0%
0.0%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Married Couples Poverty vs State vs National
1.681180.33%3.3%(-2.97)#44.5%(-4.13)#210
2.681350.62%3.3%(-2.68)#204.5%(-3.85)#768
3.681300.71%3.3%(-2.59)#304.5%(-3.75)#1,016
4.681360.71%3.3%(-2.58)#314.5%(-3.75)#1,029
5.681220.87%3.3%(-2.42)#444.5%(-3.59)#1,469
6.681420.97%3.3%(-2.33)#484.5%(-3.49)#1,766
7.681380.97%3.3%(-2.33)#494.5%(-3.49)#1,767
8.681521.3%3.3%(-1.95)#784.5%(-3.12)#3,000
9.681321.4%3.3%(-1.94)#834.5%(-3.11)#3,042
10.681061.4%3.3%(-1.86)#874.5%(-3.03)#3,306
11.681021.4%3.3%(-1.85)#894.5%(-3.01)#3,349
12.681141.6%3.3%(-1.74)#994.5%(-2.90)#3,721
13.681441.8%3.3%(-1.51)#1154.5%(-2.68)#4,603
14.681161.9%3.3%(-1.44)#1184.5%(-2.60)#4,921
15.681642.0%3.3%(-1.27)#1274.5%(-2.44)#5,504
16.681242.4%3.3%(-0.926)#1444.5%(-2.09)#6,824
17.681543.2%3.3%(-0.091)#1944.5%(-1.26)#9,685
18.681373.9%3.3%(+0.601)#2364.5%(-0.563)#11,789
19.681273.9%3.3%(+0.643)#2394.5%(-0.521)#11,921
20.681345.1%3.3%(+1.77)#2884.5%(+0.604)#14,678
21.681045.3%3.3%(+1.99)#2964.5%(+0.827)#15,162
22.681125.6%3.3%(+2.31)#3044.5%(+1.14)#15,815
23.681175.9%3.3%(+2.55)#3124.5%(+1.39)#16,276
24.681576.0%3.3%(+2.72)#3234.5%(+1.56)#16,617
25.681316.7%3.3%(+3.36)#3374.5%(+2.20)#17,658
26.681058.6%3.3%(+5.27)#3614.5%(+4.10)#20,063
27.6810710.9%3.3%(+7.63)#3904.5%(+6.47)#21,854
28.6810813.9%3.3%(+10.6)#4034.5%(+9.41)#23,232
29.6811117.6%3.3%(+14.3)#4164.5%(+13.2)#24,130
30.6811018.5%3.3%(+15.2)#4184.5%(+14.0)#24,266

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha, NE are:
#1
0.33%
#2
0.62%
#3
0.71%
#4
0.71%
#5
0.87%
#6
0.97%
#7
0.97%
#8
1.3%
#9
1.4%
#10
1.4%
What zip code has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha, NE?
68118 has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha, NE with 0.33%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha, NE?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha is 4.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Nebraska is 3.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the United States is 4.5%.