Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha

24.8%
1.1%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. 68136 1.1% 8.4% (-7.28)#11 10.0% (-8.85)#364
2. 68135 1.3% 8.4% (-7.03)#21 10.0% (-8.61)#559
3. 68118 1.5% 8.4% (-6.91)#25 10.0% (-8.48)#673
4. 68142 1.6% 8.4% (-6.80)#27 10.0% (-8.37)#769
5. 68154 2.6% 8.4% (-5.80)#61 10.0% (-7.38)#1,837
6. 68130 4.8% 8.4% (-3.62)#147 10.0% (-5.20)#5,479
7. 68132 4.9% 8.4% (-3.50)#152 10.0% (-5.07)#5,745
8. 68144 4.9% 8.4% (-3.47)#154 10.0% (-5.04)#5,800
9. 68114 4.9% 8.4% (-3.45)#157 10.0% (-5.02)#5,846
10. 68106 5.5% 8.4% (-2.85)#173 10.0% (-4.42)#7,105
11. 68116 6.0% 8.4% (-2.43)#186 10.0% (-4.00)#8,044
12. 68138 6.2% 8.4% (-2.17)#196 10.0% (-3.74)#8,609
13. 68117 7.1% 8.4% (-1.23)#226 10.0% (-2.80)#10,608
14. 68137 7.3% 8.4% (-1.05)#232 10.0% (-2.62)#10,977
15. 68157 8.0% 8.4% (-0.399)#255 10.0% (-1.97)#12,270
16. 68164 8.7% 8.4% (+0.360)#283 10.0% (-1.21)#13,743
17. 68124 9.1% 8.4% (+0.701)#291 10.0% (-0.871)#14,333
18. 68108 9.2% 8.4% (+0.861)#293 10.0% (-0.712)#14,622
19. 68134 9.4% 8.4% (+1.03)#299 10.0% (-0.543)#14,890
20. 68127 9.6% 8.4% (+1.18)#304 10.0% (-0.388)#15,182
21. 68152 10.2% 8.4% (+1.82)#322 10.0% (+0.246)#16,253
22. 68122 10.6% 8.4% (+2.24)#339 10.0% (+0.672)#16,954
23. 68112 10.9% 8.4% (+2.56)#350 10.0% (+0.985)#17,377
24. 68104 11.3% 8.4% (+2.89)#357 10.0% (+1.32)#17,858
25. 68107 13.2% 8.4% (+4.84)#395 10.0% (+3.27)#20,182
26. 68105 13.8% 8.4% (+5.39)#402 10.0% (+3.82)#20,706
27. 68102 16.5% 8.4% (+8.16)#435 10.0% (+6.59)#22,854
28. 68131 18.3% 8.4% (+9.87)#454 10.0% (+8.30)#23,867
29. 68111 22.2% 8.4% (+13.9)#475 10.0% (+12.3)#25,349
30. 68110 24.8% 8.4% (+16.4)#482 10.0% (+14.8)#25,985

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha, NE are:
#1
0.0%
#2
1.1%
#3
1.3%
#4
1.5%
#5
1.6%
#6
2.6%
#7
4.8%
#8
4.9%
#9
4.9%
#10
4.9%
What zip code has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha, NE?
68136 has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha, NE with 1.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha, NE?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha is 8.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Nebraska is 8.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.