Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 18-24
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Omaha

1.3%
83.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 68178 83.0% 24.2% (+58.8)#23 21.6% (+61.4)#856
2. 68131 55.0% 24.2% (+30.7)#48 21.6% (+33.4)#2,096
3. 68142 41.5% 24.2% (+17.3)#73 21.6% (+19.9)#3,690
4. 68102 40.5% 24.2% (+16.3)#76 21.6% (+18.9)#3,849
5. 68106 38.8% 24.2% (+14.6)#82 21.6% (+17.2)#4,174
6. 68105 31.7% 24.2% (+7.46)#106 21.6% (+10.1)#5,789
7. 68132 31.5% 24.2% (+7.29)#107 21.6% (+9.91)#5,830
8. 68111 29.9% 24.2% (+5.65)#117 21.6% (+8.27)#6,300
9. 68124 25.3% 24.2% (+1.10)#136 21.6% (+3.72)#7,860
10. 68114 24.8% 24.2% (+0.595)#141 21.6% (+3.22)#8,098
11. 68127 24.2% 24.2% (-0.043)#143 21.6% (+2.58)#8,322
12. 68107 20.1% 24.2% (-4.08)#161 21.6% (-1.45)#10,092
13. 68144 19.4% 24.2% (-4.78)#165 21.6% (-2.16)#10,458
14. 68138 19.4% 24.2% (-4.85)#166 21.6% (-2.23)#10,492
15. 68110 19.1% 24.2% (-5.14)#168 21.6% (-2.51)#10,648
16. 68157 18.7% 24.2% (-5.51)#172 21.6% (-2.88)#10,849
17. 68104 18.5% 24.2% (-5.69)#174 21.6% (-3.06)#10,926
18. 68136 17.8% 24.2% (-6.39)#176 21.6% (-3.76)#11,319
19. 68108 17.1% 24.2% (-7.16)#179 21.6% (-4.53)#11,750
20. 68152 17.0% 24.2% (-7.26)#180 21.6% (-4.64)#11,796
21. 68134 16.2% 24.2% (-7.98)#184 21.6% (-5.35)#12,229
22. 68164 13.2% 24.2% (-11.0)#201 21.6% (-8.36)#13,935
23. 68154 13.2% 24.2% (-11.1)#202 21.6% (-8.44)#13,987
24. 68137 10.5% 24.2% (-13.7)#218 21.6% (-11.1)#15,557
25. 68112 9.5% 24.2% (-14.8)#225 21.6% (-12.1)#16,266
26. 68116 8.4% 24.2% (-15.9)#232 21.6% (-13.2)#16,993
27. 68122 7.5% 24.2% (-16.8)#238 21.6% (-14.1)#17,580
28. 68135 5.6% 24.2% (-18.6)#251 21.6% (-16.0)#18,716
29. 68130 4.4% 24.2% (-19.9)#259 21.6% (-17.2)#19,405
30. 68117 1.3% 24.2% (-22.9)#275 21.6% (-20.3)#20,768

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Omaha, NE are:
#1
83.0%
#2
55.0%
#3
41.5%
#4
40.5%
#5
38.8%
#6
31.7%
#7
31.5%
#8
29.9%
#9
25.3%
#10
24.8%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Omaha, NE?
68178 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Omaha, NE with 83.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Omaha, NE?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Omaha is 23.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Nebraska is 24.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the United States is 21.6%.