Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Omaha

1.1%
36.7%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Single Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. 68112 36.7% 10.8% (+25.9)#47 12.4% (+24.2)#2,991
2. 68114 35.5% 10.8% (+24.7)#48 12.4% (+23.0)#3,138
3. 68111 30.9% 10.8% (+20.1)#50 12.4% (+18.5)#3,803
4. 68127 29.5% 10.8% (+18.8)#53 12.4% (+17.1)#4,039
5. 68108 26.4% 10.8% (+15.6)#65 12.4% (+14.0)#4,685
6. 68107 19.8% 10.8% (+9.00)#92 12.4% (+7.32)#6,584
7. 68144 19.6% 10.8% (+8.85)#93 12.4% (+7.17)#6,630
8. 68104 18.9% 10.8% (+8.11)#96 12.4% (+6.43)#6,882
9. 68132 12.3% 10.8% (+1.51)#123 12.4% (-0.169)#9,761
10. 68110 9.8% 10.8% (-0.991)#135 12.4% (-2.67)#11,132
11. 68131 8.9% 10.8% (-1.84)#139 12.4% (-3.52)#11,617
12. 68117 8.9% 10.8% (-1.90)#140 12.4% (-3.58)#11,656
13. 68136 8.3% 10.8% (-2.46)#144 12.4% (-4.14)#12,010
14. 68124 7.7% 10.8% (-3.10)#147 12.4% (-4.77)#12,390
15. 68152 5.3% 10.8% (-5.44)#158 12.4% (-7.12)#13,784
16. 68105 5.0% 10.8% (-5.75)#162 12.4% (-7.43)#13,961
17. 68154 4.5% 10.8% (-6.28)#167 12.4% (-7.95)#14,279
18. 68157 3.0% 10.8% (-7.71)#171 12.4% (-9.39)#15,085
19. 68106 3.0% 10.8% (-7.73)#172 12.4% (-9.41)#15,092
20. 68134 2.5% 10.8% (-8.25)#178 12.4% (-9.93)#15,406
21. 68164 1.6% 10.8% (-9.20)#179 12.4% (-10.9)#15,814
22. 68137 1.1% 10.8% (-9.67)#180 12.4% (-11.3)#15,974

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Omaha, NE are:
#1
36.7%
#2
35.5%
#3
30.9%
#4
29.5%
#5
26.4%
#6
19.8%
#7
19.6%
#8
18.9%
#9
12.3%
#10
9.8%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Omaha, NE?
68112 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Omaha, NE with 36.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in Omaha, NE?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in Omaha is 13.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in Nebraska is 10.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States is 12.4%.