Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Birth Rate | In Labor Force
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha

200.0
0.0
Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Births / 1,000 Women vs State vs National
1.6813116.059.0(-43.0)#2448.0(-32.0)#1,780
2.6810626.059.0(-33.0)#5948.0(-22.0)#4,212
3.6810226.059.0(-33.0)#6048.0(-22.0)#4,273
4.6813633.059.0(-26.0)#8448.0(-15.0)#6,354
5.6811640.059.0(-19.0)#11448.0(-8.00)#8,521
6.6813244.059.0(-15.0)#12748.0(-4.00)#9,975
7.6814445.059.0(-14.0)#13148.0(-3.00)#10,216
8.6813745.059.0(-14.0)#13248.0(-3.00)#10,222
9.6815445.059.0(-14.0)#13348.0(-3.00)#10,228
10.6813846.059.0(-13.0)#14048.0(-2.00)#10,629
11.6810847.059.0(-12.0)#14248.0(-1.000)#10,906
12.6812255.059.0(-4.00)#17548.0(+7.00)#13,247
13.6811157.059.0(-2.00)#18348.0(+9.00)#13,731
14.6813560.059.0(+1.000)#19848.0(+12.0)#14,415
15.6813462.059.0(+3.00)#20848.0(+14.0)#14,835
16.6811863.059.0(+4.00)#21248.0(+15.0)#15,128
17.6811764.059.0(+5.00)#21548.0(+16.0)#15,365
18.6816468.059.0(+9.00)#22548.0(+20.0)#16,091
19.6812468.059.0(+9.00)#22748.0(+20.0)#16,124
20.6810769.059.0(+10.00)#22948.0(+21.0)#16,276
21.6813072.059.0(+13.0)#24048.0(+24.0)#16,829
22.6810573.059.0(+14.0)#24348.0(+25.0)#16,973
23.6810476.059.0(+17.0)#25248.0(+28.0)#17,394
24.6814276.059.0(+17.0)#25348.0(+28.0)#17,464
25.6811481.059.0(+22.0)#26148.0(+33.0)#18,047
26.6812789.059.0(+30.0)#27648.0(+41.0)#18,881
27.6811098.059.0(+39.0)#28648.0(+50.0)#19,594
28.68157109.059.0(+50.0)#29548.0(+61.0)#20,228
29.68152116.059.0(+57.0)#30548.0(+68.0)#20,555
30.68112152.059.0(+93.0)#34448.0(+104)#21,601

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha, NE are:
#1
16.0
#2
26.0
#3
26.0
#4
33.0
#5
40.0
#6
44.0
#7
45.0
#8
45.0
#9
45.0
#10
46.0
What zip code has the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha, NE?
68131 has the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha, NE with 16.0.
What is the Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha, NE?
Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Omaha is 59.0.
What is the Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Nebraska?
Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Nebraska is 59.0.
What is the Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in the United States?
Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in the United States is 48.0.