Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Health Technologists
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Omaha

0.0%
15.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Omaha, NE

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.6810210.4%4.5%(+5.86)#194.3%(+6.11)#1,334
2.681189.5%4.5%(+4.96)#294.3%(+5.22)#1,714
3.681308.9%4.5%(+4.39)#384.3%(+4.65)#2,071
4.681248.8%4.5%(+4.22)#404.3%(+4.48)#2,187
5.681228.4%4.5%(+3.88)#444.3%(+4.13)#2,457
6.681167.8%4.5%(+3.30)#524.3%(+3.55)#2,983
7.681527.8%4.5%(+3.23)#544.3%(+3.49)#3,052
8.681146.8%4.5%(+2.26)#754.3%(+2.52)#4,362
9.681356.4%4.5%(+1.86)#964.3%(+2.12)#5,093
10.681326.4%4.5%(+1.83)#984.3%(+2.08)#5,175
11.681065.6%4.5%(+1.10)#1194.3%(+1.35)#6,850
12.681055.1%4.5%(+0.572)#1574.3%(+0.825)#8,437
13.681365.0%4.5%(+0.477)#1634.3%(+0.731)#8,746
14.681044.9%4.5%(+0.378)#1664.3%(+0.631)#9,061
15.681444.8%4.5%(+0.212)#1744.3%(+0.465)#9,601
16.681544.5%4.5%(-0.024)#1854.3%(+0.230)#10,431
17.681274.2%4.5%(-0.354)#2064.3%(-0.101)#11,795
18.681643.9%4.5%(-0.632)#2194.3%(-0.379)#12,955
19.681123.8%4.5%(-0.722)#2284.3%(-0.469)#13,374
20.681313.7%4.5%(-0.790)#2334.3%(-0.537)#13,682
21.681373.3%4.5%(-1.26)#2634.3%(-1.01)#15,804
22.681423.2%4.5%(-1.33)#2654.3%(-1.07)#16,117
23.681343.2%4.5%(-1.37)#2694.3%(-1.11)#16,314
24.681073.1%4.5%(-1.49)#2814.3%(-1.23)#16,845
25.681383.0%4.5%(-1.53)#2894.3%(-1.27)#17,026
26.681082.6%4.5%(-1.97)#3154.3%(-1.72)#19,111
27.681102.5%4.5%(-2.03)#3224.3%(-1.78)#19,378
28.681572.1%4.5%(-2.49)#3614.3%(-2.23)#21,348
29.681171.5%4.5%(-3.07)#3984.3%(-2.81)#23,523
30.681780.63%4.5%(-3.91)#4484.3%(-3.66)#25,925
31.681110.41%4.5%(-4.13)#4574.3%(-3.88)#26,311

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Omaha, NE are:
#1
10.4%
#2
9.5%
#3
8.9%
#4
8.8%
#5
8.4%
#6
7.8%
#7
7.8%
#8
6.8%
#9
6.4%
#10
6.4%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Omaha, NE?
68102 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Omaha, NE with 10.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Omaha, NE?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Omaha is 5.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Nebraska?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Nebraska is 4.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States is 4.3%.