Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha

1.1%
24.8%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. 68110 24.8% 8.4% (+16.4)#19 10.0% (+14.8)#2,351
2. 68111 22.2% 8.4% (+13.9)#26 10.0% (+12.3)#2,987
3. 68131 18.3% 8.4% (+9.87)#47 10.0% (+8.30)#4,469
4. 68102 16.5% 8.4% (+8.16)#66 10.0% (+6.59)#5,482
5. 68105 13.8% 8.4% (+5.39)#99 10.0% (+3.82)#7,630
6. 68107 13.2% 8.4% (+4.84)#106 10.0% (+3.27)#8,154
7. 68104 11.3% 8.4% (+2.89)#144 10.0% (+1.32)#10,478
8. 68112 10.9% 8.4% (+2.56)#151 10.0% (+0.985)#10,959
9. 68122 10.6% 8.4% (+2.24)#162 10.0% (+0.672)#11,382
10. 68152 10.2% 8.4% (+1.82)#179 10.0% (+0.246)#12,083
11. 68127 9.6% 8.4% (+1.18)#197 10.0% (-0.388)#13,154
12. 68134 9.4% 8.4% (+1.03)#202 10.0% (-0.543)#13,446
13. 68108 9.2% 8.4% (+0.861)#208 10.0% (-0.712)#13,714
14. 68124 9.1% 8.4% (+0.701)#210 10.0% (-0.871)#14,003
15. 68164 8.7% 8.4% (+0.360)#218 10.0% (-1.21)#14,593
16. 68157 8.0% 8.4% (-0.399)#246 10.0% (-1.97)#16,066
17. 68137 7.3% 8.4% (-1.05)#269 10.0% (-2.62)#17,359
18. 68117 7.1% 8.4% (-1.23)#275 10.0% (-2.80)#17,728
19. 68138 6.2% 8.4% (-2.17)#305 10.0% (-3.74)#19,726
20. 68116 6.0% 8.4% (-2.43)#315 10.0% (-4.00)#20,292
21. 68106 5.5% 8.4% (-2.85)#328 10.0% (-4.42)#21,229
22. 68114 4.9% 8.4% (-3.45)#344 10.0% (-5.02)#22,490
23. 68144 4.9% 8.4% (-3.47)#347 10.0% (-5.04)#22,536
24. 68132 4.9% 8.4% (-3.50)#349 10.0% (-5.07)#22,591
25. 68130 4.8% 8.4% (-3.62)#354 10.0% (-5.20)#22,857
26. 68154 2.6% 8.4% (-5.80)#440 10.0% (-7.38)#26,499
27. 68142 1.6% 8.4% (-6.80)#474 10.0% (-8.37)#27,567
28. 68118 1.5% 8.4% (-6.91)#476 10.0% (-8.48)#27,663
29. 68135 1.3% 8.4% (-7.03)#480 10.0% (-8.61)#27,777
30. 68136 1.1% 8.4% (-7.28)#490 10.0% (-8.85)#27,972

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha, NE are:
#1
24.8%
#2
22.2%
#3
18.3%
#4
16.5%
#5
13.8%
#6
13.2%
#7
11.3%
#8
10.9%
#9
10.6%
#10
10.2%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha, NE?
68110 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha, NE with 24.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha, NE?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Omaha is 8.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Nebraska is 8.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.