Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Transit
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha

18.9%
68.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha, NE

Zip Code % Public Transit vs State vs National
1. 68114 68.0% 34.4% (+33.6)#1 38.5% (+29.5)#45
2. 68110 58.1% 34.4% (+23.7)#4 38.5% (+19.6)#466
3. 68107 54.0% 34.4% (+19.6)#7 38.5% (+15.5)#922
4. 68134 51.8% 34.4% (+17.4)#9 38.5% (+13.3)#1,227
5. 68117 46.9% 34.4% (+12.5)#11 38.5% (+8.40)#2,236
6. 68118 45.6% 34.4% (+11.2)#12 38.5% (+7.10)#2,563
7. 68144 41.4% 34.4% (+7.00)#15 38.5% (+2.90)#3,731
8. 68124 41.3% 34.4% (+6.90)#16 38.5% (+2.80)#3,766
9. 68105 41.0% 34.4% (+6.60)#17 38.5% (+2.50)#3,832
10. 68111 35.7% 34.4% (+1.30)#22 38.5% (-2.80)#5,495
11. 68108 35.1% 34.4% (+0.700)#23 38.5% (-3.40)#5,677
12. 68102 31.9% 34.4% (-2.50)#26 38.5% (-6.60)#6,471
13. 68131 31.3% 34.4% (-3.10)#27 38.5% (-7.20)#6,608
14. 68132 29.7% 34.4% (-4.70)#28 38.5% (-8.80)#6,939
15. 68152 27.4% 34.4% (-7.00)#29 38.5% (-11.1)#7,288
16. 68106 26.3% 34.4% (-8.10)#30 38.5% (-12.2)#7,438
17. 68104 26.0% 34.4% (-8.40)#31 38.5% (-12.5)#7,460
18. 68112 22.3% 34.4% (-12.1)#37 38.5% (-16.2)#7,879
19. 68178 22.3% 34.4% (-12.1)#38 38.5% (-16.2)#7,882
20. 68182 19.9% 34.4% (-14.5)#41 38.5% (-18.6)#8,061
21. 68137 18.9% 34.4% (-15.5)#42 38.5% (-19.6)#8,125

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha, NE are:
#1
68.0%
#2
58.1%
#3
54.0%
#4
51.8%
#5
46.9%
#6
45.6%
#7
41.4%
#8
41.3%
#9
41.0%
#10
35.7%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha, NE?
68114 has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha, NE with 68.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha, NE?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha is 32.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nebraska?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nebraska is 34.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States is 38.5%.