Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Boys 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha

0.82%
46.7%
Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Child Poverty (Boys) vs State vs National
1. 68111 46.7% 12.2% (+34.5)#19 16.9% (+29.8)#2,359
2. 68110 45.5% 12.2% (+33.3)#21 16.9% (+28.6)#2,506
3. 68108 38.6% 12.2% (+26.3)#32 16.9% (+21.7)#3,621
4. 68131 34.2% 12.2% (+22.0)#42 16.9% (+17.3)#4,550
5. 68102 33.3% 12.2% (+21.1)#45 16.9% (+16.4)#4,757
6. 68112 27.8% 12.2% (+15.5)#64 16.9% (+10.9)#6,498
7. 68107 25.9% 12.2% (+13.7)#76 16.9% (+9.03)#7,167
8. 68157 24.3% 12.2% (+12.1)#84 16.9% (+7.43)#7,836
9. 68104 20.3% 12.2% (+8.06)#115 16.9% (+3.39)#9,739
10. 68105 19.2% 12.2% (+6.94)#128 16.9% (+2.27)#10,351
11. 68134 18.0% 12.2% (+5.80)#135 16.9% (+1.13)#10,923
12. 68117 15.0% 12.2% (+2.77)#155 16.9% (-1.89)#12,782
13. 68154 12.0% 12.2% (-0.234)#189 16.9% (-4.90)#14,799
14. 68127 10.0% 12.2% (-2.28)#207 16.9% (-6.95)#16,349
15. 68114 9.7% 12.2% (-2.52)#211 16.9% (-7.19)#16,562
16. 68144 9.0% 12.2% (-3.27)#220 16.9% (-7.94)#17,218
17. 68137 8.2% 12.2% (-3.99)#232 16.9% (-8.66)#17,857
18. 68138 6.6% 12.2% (-5.66)#257 16.9% (-10.3)#19,303
19. 68136 5.9% 12.2% (-6.37)#269 16.9% (-11.0)#19,940
20. 68106 5.6% 12.2% (-6.66)#276 16.9% (-11.3)#20,185
21. 68164 5.1% 12.2% (-7.14)#294 16.9% (-11.8)#20,643
22. 68116 4.9% 12.2% (-7.39)#300 16.9% (-12.1)#20,871
23. 68135 3.8% 12.2% (-8.41)#327 16.9% (-13.1)#21,799
24. 68122 3.5% 12.2% (-8.76)#331 16.9% (-13.4)#22,108
25. 68132 3.3% 12.2% (-8.99)#335 16.9% (-13.7)#22,296
26. 68124 3.2% 12.2% (-9.03)#338 16.9% (-13.7)#22,340
27. 68130 0.82% 12.2% (-11.4)#382 16.9% (-16.1)#24,221

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE are:
#1
46.7%
#2
45.5%
#3
38.6%
#4
34.2%
#5
33.3%
#6
27.8%
#7
25.9%
#8
24.3%
#9
20.3%
#10
19.2%
What zip code has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE?
68111 has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE with 46.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha is 16.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska is 12.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.