Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 75+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Omaha

2.6%
41.8%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. 68102 41.8% 10.3% (+31.5)#14 11.1% (+30.8)#1,193
2. 68110 29.7% 10.3% (+19.4)#33 11.1% (+18.7)#2,414
3. 68111 22.9% 10.3% (+12.6)#68 11.1% (+11.8)#3,979
4. 68131 18.1% 10.3% (+7.78)#102 11.1% (+7.02)#5,961
5. 68124 17.8% 10.3% (+7.51)#105 11.1% (+6.74)#6,108
6. 68107 17.0% 10.3% (+6.66)#114 11.1% (+5.90)#6,635
7. 68152 14.5% 10.3% (+4.18)#147 11.1% (+3.42)#8,358
8. 68117 14.3% 10.3% (+3.95)#154 11.1% (+3.18)#8,604
9. 68132 12.6% 10.3% (+2.33)#180 11.1% (+1.57)#10,141
10. 68134 11.2% 10.3% (+0.932)#193 11.1% (+0.169)#11,670
11. 68164 11.0% 10.3% (+0.711)#200 11.1% (-0.052)#11,919
12. 68157 10.6% 10.3% (+0.288)#211 11.1% (-0.475)#12,421
13. 68122 9.6% 10.3% (-0.659)#233 11.1% (-1.42)#13,678
14. 68137 9.5% 10.3% (-0.755)#238 11.1% (-1.52)#13,821
15. 68116 8.8% 10.3% (-1.54)#250 11.1% (-2.31)#14,948
16. 68127 8.7% 10.3% (-1.58)#253 11.1% (-2.34)#14,987
17. 68105 7.2% 10.3% (-3.07)#286 11.1% (-3.83)#17,176
18. 68106 6.9% 10.3% (-3.45)#296 11.1% (-4.21)#17,764
19. 68112 6.7% 10.3% (-3.56)#299 11.1% (-4.32)#17,919
20. 68104 6.4% 10.3% (-3.86)#309 11.1% (-4.62)#18,388
21. 68108 5.2% 10.3% (-5.12)#349 11.1% (-5.89)#20,313
22. 68135 5.1% 10.3% (-5.23)#351 11.1% (-5.99)#20,485
23. 68118 4.8% 10.3% (-5.50)#356 11.1% (-6.27)#20,862
24. 68114 4.8% 10.3% (-5.52)#357 11.1% (-6.28)#20,886
25. 68144 3.6% 10.3% (-6.72)#382 11.1% (-7.48)#22,533
26. 68130 3.3% 10.3% (-6.98)#393 11.1% (-7.74)#22,868
27. 68154 2.6% 10.3% (-7.66)#413 11.1% (-8.42)#23,556

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Omaha, NE are:
#1
41.8%
#2
29.7%
#3
22.9%
#4
18.1%
#5
17.8%
#6
17.0%
#7
14.5%
#8
14.3%
#9
12.6%
#10
11.2%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Omaha, NE?
68102 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Omaha, NE with 41.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Omaha, NE?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Omaha is 9.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Nebraska is 10.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in the United States is 11.1%.