Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Boys 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha

46.7%
0.82%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Child Poverty (Boys) vs State vs National
1. 68130 0.82% 12.2% (-11.4)#3 16.9% (-16.1)#247
2. 68124 3.2% 12.2% (-9.03)#47 16.9% (-13.7)#2,128
3. 68132 3.3% 12.2% (-8.99)#50 16.9% (-13.7)#2,170
4. 68122 3.5% 12.2% (-8.76)#54 16.9% (-13.4)#2,360
5. 68135 3.8% 12.2% (-8.41)#58 16.9% (-13.1)#2,669
6. 68116 4.9% 12.2% (-7.39)#85 16.9% (-12.1)#3,597
7. 68164 5.1% 12.2% (-7.14)#91 16.9% (-11.8)#3,825
8. 68106 5.6% 12.2% (-6.66)#109 16.9% (-11.3)#4,283
9. 68136 5.9% 12.2% (-6.37)#116 16.9% (-11.0)#4,528
10. 68138 6.6% 12.2% (-5.66)#128 16.9% (-10.3)#5,165
11. 68137 8.2% 12.2% (-3.99)#153 16.9% (-8.66)#6,611
12. 68144 9.0% 12.2% (-3.27)#165 16.9% (-7.94)#7,250
13. 68114 9.7% 12.2% (-2.52)#174 16.9% (-7.19)#7,905
14. 68127 10.0% 12.2% (-2.28)#178 16.9% (-6.95)#8,119
15. 68154 12.0% 12.2% (-0.234)#196 16.9% (-4.90)#9,669
16. 68117 15.0% 12.2% (+2.77)#230 16.9% (-1.89)#11,685
17. 68134 18.0% 12.2% (+5.80)#250 16.9% (+1.13)#13,545
18. 68105 19.2% 12.2% (+6.94)#257 16.9% (+2.27)#14,117
19. 68104 20.3% 12.2% (+8.06)#270 16.9% (+3.39)#14,729
20. 68157 24.3% 12.2% (+12.1)#301 16.9% (+7.43)#16,632
21. 68107 25.9% 12.2% (+13.7)#309 16.9% (+9.03)#17,301
22. 68112 27.8% 12.2% (+15.5)#321 16.9% (+10.9)#17,970
23. 68102 33.3% 12.2% (+21.1)#339 16.9% (+16.4)#19,642
24. 68131 34.2% 12.2% (+22.0)#343 16.9% (+17.3)#19,918
25. 68108 38.6% 12.2% (+26.3)#353 16.9% (+21.7)#20,847
26. 68110 45.5% 12.2% (+33.3)#364 16.9% (+28.6)#21,962
27. 68111 46.7% 12.2% (+34.5)#366 16.9% (+29.8)#22,109

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE are:
#1
0.0%
#2
0.0%
#3
0.0%
#4
0.0%
#5
0.82%
#6
3.2%
#7
3.3%
#8
3.5%
#9
3.8%
#10
4.9%
What zip code has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE?
68130 has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE with 0.82%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Omaha is 16.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska is 12.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.