Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha

0.70%
53.5%
Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. 68111 53.5% 12.1% (+41.5)#12 17.0% (+36.6)#1,725
2. 68131 48.0% 12.1% (+35.9)#19 17.0% (+31.0)#2,278
3. 68110 41.5% 12.1% (+29.4)#25 17.0% (+24.6)#3,102
4. 68105 31.5% 12.1% (+19.4)#45 17.0% (+14.6)#5,308
5. 68108 28.3% 12.1% (+16.2)#57 17.0% (+11.4)#6,274
6. 68104 22.0% 12.1% (+9.86)#94 17.0% (+4.98)#8,889
7. 68112 21.8% 12.1% (+9.71)#95 17.0% (+4.82)#8,968
8. 68107 21.4% 12.1% (+9.29)#98 17.0% (+4.41)#9,184
9. 68102 21.1% 12.1% (+9.02)#99 17.0% (+4.14)#9,306
10. 68134 16.9% 12.1% (+4.76)#124 17.0% (-0.125)#11,608
11. 68127 15.7% 12.1% (+3.58)#139 17.0% (-1.30)#12,328
12. 68117 13.4% 12.1% (+1.36)#157 17.0% (-3.53)#13,805
13. 68157 12.2% 12.1% (+0.061)#175 17.0% (-4.82)#14,691
14. 68124 11.1% 12.1% (-0.979)#191 17.0% (-5.86)#15,402
15. 68144 10.5% 12.1% (-1.60)#202 17.0% (-6.49)#15,885
16. 68154 7.8% 12.1% (-4.28)#242 17.0% (-9.17)#17,972
17. 68132 6.9% 12.1% (-5.16)#254 17.0% (-10.0)#18,773
18. 68164 5.8% 12.1% (-6.34)#271 17.0% (-11.2)#19,747
19. 68114 5.3% 12.1% (-6.76)#277 17.0% (-11.6)#20,119
20. 68137 4.4% 12.1% (-7.69)#294 17.0% (-12.6)#20,960
21. 68152 4.2% 12.1% (-7.87)#297 17.0% (-12.8)#21,118
22. 68122 3.8% 12.1% (-8.33)#310 17.0% (-13.2)#21,537
23. 68138 3.0% 12.1% (-9.12)#326 17.0% (-14.0)#22,218
24. 68135 2.4% 12.1% (-9.72)#335 17.0% (-14.6)#22,727
25. 68116 2.1% 12.1% (-9.97)#340 17.0% (-14.9)#22,934
26. 68106 1.8% 12.1% (-10.3)#346 17.0% (-15.2)#23,207
27. 68136 1.1% 12.1% (-11.0)#359 17.0% (-15.9)#23,705
28. 68130 0.70% 12.1% (-11.4)#365 17.0% (-16.3)#23,958

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE are:
#1
53.5%
#2
48.0%
#3
41.5%
#4
31.5%
#5
28.3%
#6
22.0%
#7
21.8%
#8
21.4%
#9
21.1%
#10
16.9%
What zip code has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE?
68111 has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE with 53.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha, NE?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Omaha is 16.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska is 12.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.