Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Management
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha

2.1%
21.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha, NE

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 68130 21.0% 11.3% (+9.72)#139 11.0% (+10.0)#2,732
2. 68142 18.0% 11.3% (+6.74)#208 11.0% (+7.03)#4,244
3. 68136 17.6% 11.3% (+6.32)#217 11.0% (+6.61)#4,555
4. 68118 16.5% 11.3% (+5.24)#243 11.0% (+5.53)#5,418
5. 68135 15.4% 11.3% (+4.11)#258 11.0% (+4.40)#6,540
6. 68152 15.3% 11.3% (+3.96)#264 11.0% (+4.24)#6,731
7. 68116 14.8% 11.3% (+3.52)#277 11.0% (+3.80)#7,282
8. 68124 13.1% 11.3% (+1.80)#322 11.0% (+2.09)#9,776
9. 68132 12.5% 11.3% (+1.15)#345 11.0% (+1.44)#10,896
10. 68106 12.1% 11.3% (+0.752)#354 11.0% (+1.04)#11,659
11. 68154 11.8% 11.3% (+0.467)#366 11.0% (+0.752)#12,206
12. 68122 11.8% 11.3% (+0.457)#368 11.0% (+0.742)#12,245
13. 68137 11.6% 11.3% (+0.307)#372 11.0% (+0.592)#12,569
14. 68164 11.4% 11.3% (+0.047)#385 11.0% (+0.332)#13,104
15. 68144 11.2% 11.3% (-0.141)#390 11.0% (+0.144)#13,526
16. 68102 10.7% 11.3% (-0.575)#407 11.0% (-0.290)#14,509
17. 68117 9.9% 11.3% (-1.41)#438 11.0% (-1.12)#16,496
18. 68134 9.7% 11.3% (-1.59)#445 11.0% (-1.30)#16,964
19. 68114 8.8% 11.3% (-2.52)#476 11.0% (-2.23)#19,266
20. 68138 8.6% 11.3% (-2.66)#480 11.0% (-2.38)#19,638
21. 68112 7.8% 11.3% (-3.47)#492 11.0% (-3.19)#21,624
22. 68104 7.0% 11.3% (-4.29)#503 11.0% (-4.00)#23,478
23. 68127 6.8% 11.3% (-4.51)#509 11.0% (-4.23)#23,935
24. 68105 6.1% 11.3% (-5.16)#520 11.0% (-4.87)#25,223
25. 68131 5.9% 11.3% (-5.40)#526 11.0% (-5.11)#25,637
26. 68107 4.6% 11.3% (-6.68)#540 11.0% (-6.40)#27,602
27. 68108 4.1% 11.3% (-7.25)#549 11.0% (-6.96)#28,268
28. 68182 4.0% 11.3% (-7.32)#552 11.0% (-7.03)#28,339
29. 68157 3.6% 11.3% (-7.71)#557 11.0% (-7.43)#28,709
30. 68110 3.0% 11.3% (-8.28)#560 11.0% (-7.99)#29,169
31. 68111 2.6% 11.3% (-8.72)#563 11.0% (-8.44)#29,465
32. 68178 2.1% 11.3% (-9.22)#565 11.0% (-8.93)#29,726

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha, NE are:
#1
21.0%
#2
18.0%
#3
17.6%
#4
16.5%
#5
15.4%
#6
15.3%
#7
14.8%
#8
13.1%
#9
12.5%
#10
12.1%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha, NE?
68130 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha, NE with 21.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha, NE?
Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha is 10.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Nebraska?
Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Nebraska is 11.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States is 11.0%.