Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Management
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha

0.0%
25.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha, NE

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.6813021.0%11.3%(+9.72)#13911.0%(+10.0)#2,732
2.6814218.0%11.3%(+6.74)#20811.0%(+7.03)#4,244
3.6813617.6%11.3%(+6.32)#21711.0%(+6.61)#4,555
4.6811816.5%11.3%(+5.24)#24311.0%(+5.53)#5,418
5.6813515.4%11.3%(+4.11)#25811.0%(+4.40)#6,540
6.6815215.3%11.3%(+3.96)#26411.0%(+4.24)#6,731
7.6811614.8%11.3%(+3.52)#27711.0%(+3.80)#7,282
8.6812413.1%11.3%(+1.80)#32211.0%(+2.09)#9,776
9.6813212.5%11.3%(+1.15)#34511.0%(+1.44)#10,896
10.6810612.1%11.3%(+0.752)#35411.0%(+1.04)#11,659
11.6815411.8%11.3%(+0.467)#36611.0%(+0.752)#12,206
12.6812211.8%11.3%(+0.457)#36811.0%(+0.742)#12,245
13.6813711.6%11.3%(+0.307)#37211.0%(+0.592)#12,569
14.6816411.4%11.3%(+0.047)#38511.0%(+0.332)#13,104
15.6814411.2%11.3%(-0.141)#39011.0%(+0.144)#13,526
16.6810210.7%11.3%(-0.575)#40711.0%(-0.290)#14,509
17.681179.9%11.3%(-1.41)#43811.0%(-1.12)#16,496
18.681349.7%11.3%(-1.59)#44511.0%(-1.30)#16,964
19.681148.8%11.3%(-2.52)#47611.0%(-2.23)#19,266
20.681388.6%11.3%(-2.66)#48011.0%(-2.38)#19,638
21.681127.8%11.3%(-3.47)#49211.0%(-3.19)#21,624
22.681047.0%11.3%(-4.29)#50311.0%(-4.00)#23,478
23.681276.8%11.3%(-4.51)#50911.0%(-4.23)#23,935
24.681056.1%11.3%(-5.16)#52011.0%(-4.87)#25,223
25.681315.9%11.3%(-5.40)#52611.0%(-5.11)#25,637
26.681074.6%11.3%(-6.68)#54011.0%(-6.40)#27,602
27.681084.1%11.3%(-7.25)#54911.0%(-6.96)#28,268
28.681824.0%11.3%(-7.32)#55211.0%(-7.03)#28,339
29.681573.6%11.3%(-7.71)#55711.0%(-7.43)#28,709
30.681103.0%11.3%(-8.28)#56011.0%(-7.99)#29,169
31.681112.6%11.3%(-8.72)#56311.0%(-8.44)#29,465
32.681782.1%11.3%(-9.22)#56511.0%(-8.93)#29,726

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha, NE are:
#1
21.0%
#2
18.0%
#3
17.6%
#4
16.5%
#5
15.4%
#6
15.3%
#7
14.8%
#8
13.1%
#9
12.5%
#10
12.1%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha, NE?
68130 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha, NE with 21.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha, NE?
Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Omaha is 10.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Nebraska?
Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Nebraska is 11.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States is 11.0%.