Turkish vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Oceania
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Oceania
47.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
93.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,815,106 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 47.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 2.7%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 39.7% | 16.2% |
| Maximum | 72.0% | 91.9% |
| Range | 32.3% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 53.0% | 44.8% |
| Median | 51.8% | 46.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 49.1% | 40.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.0% | 48.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 13.5% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Turks by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Germany (47.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Cypriot (47.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Celtic (47.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Serbian (47.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Sweden (47.8%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 94.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Egyptians | 94.8 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 94.8 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 94.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Celtics | 94.2 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 94.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Turks | 93.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Cypriots | 93.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Serbians | 93.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 93.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 93.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 47.7% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 92.9 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 47.7% |
| Tsimshian | 92.4 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 47.7% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 92.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |