Lebanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married
COMPARE
Lebanese
Immigrants from Oceania
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Lebanese
Immigrants from Oceania
47.9%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lebanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,555,158 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 47.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 2.9%.

Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lebanese | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 18.3% | 16.2% |
Maximum | 81.9% | 91.9% |
Range | 63.6% | 75.7% |
Mean | 53.4% | 44.8% |
Median | 53.2% | 46.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 49.1% | 40.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.3% | 48.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 13.5% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Lebanese by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Native Hawaiian (47.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Korean (47.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (47.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Egyptian (47.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (47.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 48.0% |
Jordanians | 96.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 48.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 48.0% |
Indians (Asian) | 95.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 48.0% |
Americans | 95.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 48.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 95.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Koreans | 95.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Lebanese | 95.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 94.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Egyptians | 94.8 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 94.8 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | China | 94.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 94.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Celtics | 94.2 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |