Ugandan vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married
COMPARE
Ugandan
Immigrants from Oceania
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Ugandans
Immigrants from Oceania
44.2%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,016,399 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.086 and weighted average of 44.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 5.2%.

Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 21.7% | 16.2% |
Maximum | 77.7% | 91.9% |
Range | 56.0% | 75.7% |
Mean | 47.5% | 44.8% |
Median | 46.4% | 46.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.1% | 40.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.4% | 48.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.3% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 13.5% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Nicaraguan (44.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Cameroon (44.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (44.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (44.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Blackfeet (44.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Mexican American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 44.5% |
Ethiopians | 0.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 44.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 44.5% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 44.5% |
Japanese | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 44.5% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.4 /100 | #245 | Tragic 44.3% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 44.3% |
Ugandans | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 44.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 44.2% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 44.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 44.2% |
Blackfeet | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 44.2% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.1% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 44.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 44.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |