Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Immigrants from Oceania
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Lithuanians
Immigrants from Oceania
49.0%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,888,546 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183 and weighted average of 49.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 5.3%.

Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 10.0% | 16.2% |
| Maximum | 72.5% | 91.9% |
| Range | 62.5% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 49.3% | 44.8% |
| Median | 51.6% | 46.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 42.6% | 40.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.8% | 48.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.2% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 13.5% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Maltese (49.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Korea (49.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Pakistan (49.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Burmese (48.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Welsh (48.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 49.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 49.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 49.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 49.0% |
| Maltese | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 49.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 49.0% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Welsh | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |