Ute vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married
COMPARE
Ute
Immigrants from Oceania
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Ute
Immigrants from Oceania
43.9%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,668,599 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.482 and weighted average of 43.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 6.1%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 21.0% | 16.2% |
Maximum | 77.2% | 91.9% |
Range | 56.2% | 75.7% |
Mean | 46.6% | 44.8% |
Median | 48.4% | 46.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 37.9% | 40.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.2% | 48.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.4% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 13.5% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Ute by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Africa (43.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Shoshone (44.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (43.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Yakama (44.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Latin America (43.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Blackfeet | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 44.2% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.1% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 44.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 44.0% |
Yakama | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 44.0% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 44.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ute | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.9% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.7% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.7% |
Sudanese | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |