Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Oceania
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Oceania
49.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
74.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,135,047 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 49.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,387,032 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.425 and weighted average of 46.9%, a difference of 5.0%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 18.2% | 8.8% |
Maximum | 78.9% | 84.0% |
Range | 60.7% | 75.2% |
Mean | 51.0% | 45.7% |
Median | 51.5% | 47.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 47.0% | 41.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.1% | 51.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 13.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Scotland (49.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Philippines (49.3%, a difference of 0.15%), German (49.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Maltese (49.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Bolivian (49.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 49.6% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 49.5% |
Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 49.5% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 49.5% |
Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 49.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 49.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 49.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 49.3% |
Germans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 49.2% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 49.2% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 49.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 49.1% |
Hungarians | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 49.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 49.1% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 49.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Armenian (46.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Asia (46.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Arab (46.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Hmong (47.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Serbian (47.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.6 /100 | #150 | Good 47.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 76.8 /100 | #151 | Good 47.0% |
Serbians | 76.3 /100 | #152 | Good 47.0% |
Hmong | 76.2 /100 | #153 | Good 47.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 76.1 /100 | #154 | Good 46.9% |
Arabs | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 46.9% |
Armenians | 75.4 /100 | #156 | Good 46.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.8 /100 | #157 | Good 46.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 73.3 /100 | #158 | Good 46.9% |
Osage | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 46.9% |
Iraqis | 71.7 /100 | #160 | Good 46.9% |
Delaware | 71.2 /100 | #161 | Good 46.8% |
Colombians | 71.0 /100 | #162 | Good 46.8% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 70.2 /100 | #163 | Good 46.8% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.0 /100 | #164 | Good 46.8% |