Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Immigrants from Oceania
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Immigrants from Oceania
42.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,977,387 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.760 and weighted average of 42.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 8.7%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 19.1% | 16.2% |
| Maximum | 53.7% | 91.9% |
| Range | 34.6% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 38.9% | 44.8% |
| Median | 41.0% | 46.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 32.1% | 40.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.5% | 48.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 13.5% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Guatemalan (42.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Ghanaian (42.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |