Slavic vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married
COMPARE
Slavic
 Immigrants from Oceania
 Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Slavs
Immigrants from Oceania
48.4%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,868,948 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194 and weighted average of 48.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 3.9%.
 
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Immigrants from Oceania | 
| Minimum | 30.3% | 16.2% | 
| Maximum | 84.0% | 91.9% | 
| Range | 53.7% | 75.7% | 
| Mean | 55.2% | 44.8% | 
| Median | 53.9% | 46.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 50.0% | 40.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 63.5% | 48.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 8.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 13.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 13.5% | 
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Ukrainian (48.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Tongan (48.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Slovak (48.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from England (48.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married | 
| Latvians | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 48.5% | 
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 48.5% | 
| French | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 48.4% | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.4% | 
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.4% | 
| Romanians | 98.5 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.4% | 
| Asians | 98.5 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.4% | 
| Slavs | 98.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% | 
| Ukrainians | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% | 
| Tongans | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.3% | 
| Slovaks | 98.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 48.3% | 
| Immigrants | England | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 48.3% | 
| Canadians | 98.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 48.3% | 
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 48.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married | 
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% | 
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% | 
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% | 
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% | 
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% | 
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% | 
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% | 
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% | 
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% | 
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |