Pima vs Creek Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Pima
Creek
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Pima
Creek
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Creek Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,427,541 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.615 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 4.6%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Creek |
| Minimum | 8.6% | 9.2% |
| Maximum | 44.5% | 56.7% |
| Range | 35.9% | 47.4% |
| Mean | 19.9% | 24.6% |
| Median | 18.9% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.1% | 29.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Creek by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 0.86%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 0.97%), Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |