Pima vs Chilean Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Pima
Chilean
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Pima
Chileans
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Chilean Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,534,411 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 57.7%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Chilean |
| Minimum | 8.6% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 44.5% | 33.3% |
| Range | 35.9% | 32.8% |
| Mean | 19.9% | 11.0% |
| Median | 18.9% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.1% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Uruguayan (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (10.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Lebanon (10.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Nicaraguan (10.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Europe (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Latvians | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |