Alaskan Athabascan Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Select to Compare
Disability Age 65 to 74
Alaskan Athabascan Disability Age 65 to 74
32.4%
DISABILITY | AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,797,821 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 32.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.40% in percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Alaskan Athabascans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 within an area, or if Alaskan Athabascans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Houma (32.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Kiowa (32.6%, a difference of 0.62%), Lumbee (32.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Tsimshian (32.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 30.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 30.4% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 30.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 30.6% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 31.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 31.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 32.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 32.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 32.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 32.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 32.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 33.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 33.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 34.5% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.0% |
Alaskan Athabascan Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan Data | Disability Age 65 to 74 Data |
Minimum | 0.025% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 100.0% | 97.7% |
Mean | 40.7% | 49.4% |
Median | 31.0% | 38.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 30.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.8% | 69.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 65.3% | 39.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 33.5% | 26.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 33.2% | 26.4% |
Correlation Details
Alaskan Athabascan Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.025% | 44,537,573 | 25.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 230,145 | 31.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 113,696 | 29.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 511,205 | 26.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 152,758 | 29.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 13,940 | 31.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 79,978 | 30.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72% | 3,579 | 39.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.08% | 17,461 | 28.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 2,061 | 48.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 29,293 | 23.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.76% | 20,604 | 30.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.07% | 1,170 | 22.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.56% | 33,211 | 34.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.65% | 405 | 45.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.49% | 5,321 | 2.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.96% | 19,529 | 28.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.13% | 964 | 34.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.26% | 6,542 | 17.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.97% | 234 | 57.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.29% | 182 | 31.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 116 | 50.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.60% | 235 | 38.5% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.38% | 1,927 | 45.7% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 1,167 | 22.7% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.39% | 1,052 | 36.1% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.16% | 388 | 52.1% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.49% | 761 | 35.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.65% | 439 | 45.9% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.21% | 78 | 80.0% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.58% | 71 | 100.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.34% | 1,719 | 54.7% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.20% | 508 | 24.6% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.10% | 525 | 69.1% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.44% | 71 | 100.0% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.18% | 68 | 76.9% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.00% | 470 | 87.2% |
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.89% | 329 | 24.1% |
[ 57.5% - 58.0% ] 57.74% | 1,254 | 37.5% |
[ 60.5% - 61.0% ] 60.87% | 69 | 52.9% |
[ 61.5% - 62.0% ] 61.76% | 68 | 21.4% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.85% | 41 | 100.0% |
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.85% | 272 | 50.0% |
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.15% | 650 | 69.7% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.43% | 28 | 37.5% |
[ 72.5% - 73.0% ] 72.99% | 274 | 33.3% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.81% | 252 | 79.7% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.07% | 270 | 33.3% |
[ 74.5% - 75.0% ] 74.73% | 91 | 100.0% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.80% | 388 | 59.5% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.31% | 952 | 30.1% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.37% | 252 | 92.5% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.65% | 226 | 100.0% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.18% | 428 | 45.0% |
[ 86.0% - 86.5% ] 86.26% | 364 | 33.3% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.53% | 554 | 63.0% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.95% | 398 | 100.0% |
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.95% | 174 | 26.7% |
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.37% | 498 | 31.0% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.33% | 90 | 100.0% |
[ 99.0% - 99.5% ] 99.00% | 201 | 89.5% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 252 | 87.5% |