Nigerian vs Slovak Vision Disability
COMPARE
Nigerian
Slovak
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Nigerians
Slovaks
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
7.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
18.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nigerian vs Slovak Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,578,519 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,414,578 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%.
![Nigerian vs Slovak Vision Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/vision-disability/nigerians-vs-slovaks-vision-disability-chart.webp)
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nigerian | Slovak |
Minimum | 0.62% | 0.29% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 12.9% |
Range | 13.4% | 12.6% |
Mean | 2.6% | 3.2% |
Median | 2.2% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 3.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.74% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Nigerians and Slovaks by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (2.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Bermudan (2.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Indonesian (2.2%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Dutch (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.2% |
Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 6.1 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.3% |
Barbadians | 5.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.3% |
Portuguese | 4.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.3% |