Nigerian vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Nigerian
Chickasaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Nigerians
Chickasaw
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nigerian vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,639,431 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,679,473 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 32.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nigerian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 19.4% | 29.7% |
| Range | 17.2% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 6.4% | 12.1% |
| Median | 5.9% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Nigerians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Lebanese (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |