Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
 Immigrants from Hong Kong
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Nicaraguans
Immigrants from Hong Kong
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,654,753 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,945,747 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 2.4%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nicaraguan | Immigrants from Hong Kong | 
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.77% | 
| Maximum | 8.8% | 6.9% | 
| Range | 7.6% | 6.1% | 
| Mean | 2.8% | 2.7% | 
| Median | 2.5% | 2.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 2.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.81% | 0.63% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 0.93% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 0.92% | 
Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Africa (2.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (2.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Peruvian (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Belize (2.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Nepal (2.7%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Paraguayan (2.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Jamaican (2.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.42%), Ethiopian (2.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.7%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Paraguayans | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Jamaicans | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Nicaraguans | 97.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.7% | 
| Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.7% |