Immigrants from South Africa vs Chilean Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Chilean
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Chileans
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chilean Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,222,881 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,590,640 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.48%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Chilean |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.17% |
| Maximum | 8.6% | 4.6% |
| Range | 8.2% | 4.4% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 2.0% |
| Median | 2.2% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 0.79% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 0.89% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 0.88% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Chileans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Afghanistan (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Estonian (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Greek (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Australian (2.1%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Korean (2.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Danish (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Armenia (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Carpatho Rusyn (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Europe | 96.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 96.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Australians | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Romanians | 95.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Estonians | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Greeks | 95.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Albanians | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Swedes | 94.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Danes | 94.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Koreans | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Chileans | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 93.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Peruvians | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 92.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |