Immigrants from Congo vs Chinese Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Chinese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Chinese
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Chinese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,123,108 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,035 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.050%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0176f/0176f29285458196920dcffc8ee13873f59ee16b" alt="Immigrants from Congo vs Chinese Disability"
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Chinese |
Minimum | 4.6% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 21.1% | 29.6% |
Range | 16.5% | 26.0% |
Mean | 12.3% | 13.2% |
Median | 12.4% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo and Chinese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Yugoslavian (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Yup'ik (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Yup'ik (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bahamian (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Jamaicans | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 12.1% |
Alsatians | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 12.1% |
West Indians | 2.9 /100 | #228 | Tragic 12.2% |
Inupiat | 2.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.2% |
Samoans | 2.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.2% |
Malaysians | 2.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.2% |
Italians | 2.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.2% |
Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |