Swiss vs Chinese Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
Chinese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Swiss
Chinese
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Chinese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,998,318 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,035 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.34%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 40.6% | 29.6% |
| Range | 37.9% | 26.0% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 13.2% |
| Median | 12.1% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Chinese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), British (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Congo (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Yup'ik (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Malaysians | 2.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Italians | 2.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Europeans | 1.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% |