Zimbabwean vs Chinese Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Chinese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Chinese
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Chinese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,588 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,035 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 11.6%.
![Zimbabwean vs Chinese Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/disability/zimbabweans-vs-chinese-disability-chart.webp)
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Chinese |
Minimum | 4.5% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 21.8% | 29.6% |
Range | 17.3% | 26.0% |
Mean | 11.1% | 13.2% |
Median | 10.7% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by Disability
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Colombia (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from South America (10.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bulgarians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Congo (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Yup'ik (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Inupiat | 2.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.2% |
Samoans | 2.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.2% |
Malaysians | 2.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.2% |
Italians | 2.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.2% |
Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |