Immigrants from Congo vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Carpatho Rusyn
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Carpatho Rusyns
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
DISABILITY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,123,108 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,872,415 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 0.36%.

Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 4.6% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 21.1% | 34.3% |
Range | 16.5% | 32.4% |
Mean | 12.3% | 15.0% |
Median | 12.4% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo and Carpatho Rusyns by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Chinese (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Yugoslavian (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Guamanian/Chamorro (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Subsaharan African (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% |
Europeans | 1.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% |
Bermudans | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.3% |
Belgians | 0.8 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% |