Ute vs Chinese Disability
COMPARE
Ute
Chinese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Ute
Chinese
11.9%
DISABILITY
19.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Chinese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,668,381 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.349 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,035 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 2.7%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 29.3% | 29.6% |
| Range | 26.5% | 26.0% |
| Mean | 13.3% | 13.2% |
| Median | 12.9% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by Disability
Demographics Similar to Ute by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Lithuanian (11.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from West Indies (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Zaire (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Somali (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Iraqis | 30.0 /100 | #184 | Fair 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 28.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 28.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 11.8% |
| Lebanese | 27.9 /100 | #187 | Fair 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 23.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 21.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 11.9% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 21.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 11.9% |
| Ute | 19.5 /100 | #191 | Poor 11.9% |
| Lithuanians | 18.8 /100 | #192 | Poor 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 18.0 /100 | #193 | Poor 11.9% |
| Somalis | 17.3 /100 | #194 | Poor 11.9% |
| Barbadians | 15.8 /100 | #195 | Poor 11.9% |
| Serbians | 15.4 /100 | #196 | Poor 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 15.2 /100 | #197 | Poor 11.9% |
| Ukrainians | 14.7 /100 | #198 | Poor 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Congo (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Yup'ik (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Inupiat | 2.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Samoans | 2.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Malaysians | 2.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Italians | 2.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |