Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Chinese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Chinese
11.4%
DISABILITY
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,739,259 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,035 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 7.0%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 33.8% | 29.6% |
| Range | 32.2% | 26.0% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 13.2% |
| Median | 11.9% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Italy (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Europe (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Macedonian (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Costa Rican (11.4%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Central Americans | 93.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 89.8 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Arabs | 89.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Congo (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Yup'ik (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Inupiat | 2.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Samoans | 2.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Malaysians | 2.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Italians | 2.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |