European vs Chinese Disability
COMPARE
European
Chinese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Europeans
Chinese
12.3%
DISABILITY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
European vs Chinese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,707,574 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,035 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.43%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | European | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.41% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 29.6% |
| Range | 66.3% | 26.0% |
| Mean | 17.2% | 13.2% |
| Median | 13.4% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Europeans and Chinese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Subsaharan African (12.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Congo (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Yup'ik (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Europeans | 1.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Bermudans | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Belgians | 0.8 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% |