British West Indian vs Sudanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
British West Indian
Sudanese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
British West Indians
Sudanese
2.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
72.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Sudanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,668,246 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.135 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,125,850 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 20.5%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Sudanese |
Minimum | 0.70% | 0.77% |
Maximum | 6.7% | 6.7% |
Range | 6.0% | 5.9% |
Mean | 2.6% | 3.2% |
Median | 2.7% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.87% | 0.92% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.90% | 0.97% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.89% | 0.96% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to British West Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (2.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Vietnamese (2.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Immigrants from Ecuador (2.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Grenada | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Guyanese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Vietnamese | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.4% |
British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |