Norwegian vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Norwegian
Celtic
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Norwegians
Celtics
13.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
40.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,210,620 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,451,982 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 16.6%, a difference of 26.0%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Celtic |
Minimum | 1.6% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 70.0% | 53.6% |
Range | 68.4% | 51.4% |
Mean | 14.7% | 23.0% |
Median | 12.6% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 27.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 13.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Maltese (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (13.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Ireland (13.1%, a difference of 0.51%), Bulgarian (13.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and Bolivian (13.3%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Western Asia (16.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Kenyan (16.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Hmong (16.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Lebanese (16.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (16.7%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Ethiopians | 47.8 /100 | #177 | Average 16.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 47.5 /100 | #178 | Average 16.5% |
Hungarians | 47.3 /100 | #179 | Average 16.5% |
Hawaiians | 45.5 /100 | #180 | Average 16.5% |
South American Indians | 44.3 /100 | #181 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 43.3 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
Kenyans | 41.0 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
Celtics | 40.6 /100 | #184 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 40.4 /100 | #185 | Average 16.6% |
Hmong | 38.4 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 37.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 37.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 34.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.7% |
Arabs | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |