Immigrants from Oceania vs White/Caucasian Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
White/Caucasian
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Whites/Caucasians
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
48.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs White/Caucasian Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 585,061,010 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.957 and weighted average of 48.6%, a difference of 4.4%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 16.2% | 24.0% |
| Maximum | 91.9% | 56.4% |
| Range | 75.7% | 32.4% |
| Mean | 44.8% | 43.5% |
| Median | 46.2% | 44.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.3% | 38.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.5% | 49.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Iranian (48.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (48.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Russian (48.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Austrian (48.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Austria (48.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Belgians | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Austrians | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.1 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Iranians | 99.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Russians | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Latvians | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| French | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 48.4% |