Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Seminole Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Seminole
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Seminole
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
17.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Seminole Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,514,263 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 64.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,298,678 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Seminole and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 64.0%, a difference of 0.040%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Seminole |
| Minimum | 33.7% | 39.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 89.0% |
| Range | 66.3% | 49.7% |
| Mean | 68.7% | 64.6% |
| Median | 66.2% | 65.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.7% | 59.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.4% | 69.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Seminole by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe are Immigrants from Malaysia (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Slavic (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Canada (64.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from North America (64.0%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Canada (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North America (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 25.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 64.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 24.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 64.1% |
| Arabs | 24.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 64.1% |
| Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
| French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
| Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
| Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
| Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |