Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,953,283 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.204. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to a decrease of 18.2 Immigrants from Sudan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,363 compared to $86,109, a difference of 28.2%), per capita income ($53,799 compared to $41,986, a difference of 28.1%), and median male earnings ($64,625 compared to $51,489, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $46,791, a difference of 12.4%), median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $38,511, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,801 compared to $59,248, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.8%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 26.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (62.9% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.64%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.4%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.4%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), male disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.5%).