Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs U.S. Virgin Islander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,215,454 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.316. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.070% in U.S. Virgin Islanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 70.0 U.S. Virgin Islanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($108,830 compared to $85,294, a difference of 27.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $82,736, a difference of 26.9%), and per capita income ($47,394 compared to $37,589, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $47,448, a difference of 9.4%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $36,424, a difference of 14.0%), and wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 66.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 53.0%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 12.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 39.7%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 30.5%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 56.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.8%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 43.9%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.50%), 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 20.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.4%).