Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Zimbabweans

Exceptional
Exceptional
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,565,106 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.963. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.752% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 751.7 Zimbabweans.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Difference between Zimbabwean Ancestry and Immigrants from Zimbabwe

While Zimbabwean ancestry and immigrants from Zimbabwe may have similarities, there are subtle differences that set them apart.

Zimbabwean Ancestry

Zimbabwean ancestry refers to a person's genetic, cultural, and historical connection to Zimbabwe through their family lineage. This means that the person has Zimbabwean heritage and is likely to share some characteristics and cultural traits that are associated with Zimbabwe, such as language, customs, and traditions. It is possible to have Zimbabwean ancestry without being an immigrant from Zimbabwe.

Immigrant from Zimbabwe

On the other hand, an immigrant from Zimbabwe is a person who has moved from Zimbabwe to the United States, with the intention of settling there. This person has left their country of origin and has become a citizen or resident of the United States. An immigrant from Zimbabwe may or may not have Zimbabwean ancestry, and their cultural background and identity may be influenced by a combination of their Zimbabwean heritage and the culture of the United States.

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.8%), per capita income ($47,394 compared to $45,804, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $65,854, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $98,586, a difference of 0.72%), median family income ($108,830 compared to $110,011, a difference of 1.1%), and median household income ($89,496 compared to $90,618, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,394
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,830
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,496
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,913
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,352
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,527
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,914
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,880
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$104,992
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,643
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Fair
26.3%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.56%), single female poverty (20.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweZimbabwean
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.5%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.81%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.59%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
84.0%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.7%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.29%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.30%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.69%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Exceptional
28.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.88%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.6%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Good
6.4%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and associate's degree (50.5% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.5%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.6%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweZimbabwean
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%