Ute vs Argentinean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Ute
Argentinean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Ute
Argentineans
11.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
3.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
9.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Argentinean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,604,944 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.109 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,712,761 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.268 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%.
![Ute vs Argentinean No Vehicles in Household](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/no-vehicle-available/ute-vs-argentineans-no-vehicle-available-chart.webp)
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Argentinean |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.52% |
Maximum | 54.2% | 26.3% |
Range | 52.9% | 25.7% |
Mean | 10.0% | 8.5% |
Median | 6.5% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 10.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Argentineans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Russian (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Cree (11.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Kiowa (11.5%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Peru (11.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and Houma (11.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Zaire (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (11.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Peruvian (11.2%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from South America (11.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and Uruguayan (11.3%, a difference of 0.77%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 10.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 11.2% |
Argentineans | 9.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 11.2% |
Peruvians | 8.4 /100 | #221 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 8.0 /100 | #222 | Tragic 11.3% |
Uruguayans | 7.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 5.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 5.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Romania | 5.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 11.4% |
Ugandans | 5.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 5.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 5.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 4.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 11.5% |
Houma | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 11.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 4.5 /100 | #234 | Tragic 11.5% |
Kiowa | 4.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 11.5% |
Cree | 3.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 11.6% |
Ute | 3.3 /100 | #237 | Tragic 11.6% |
Russians | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 11.6% |