Ute vs Chickasaw Householder Income Over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,627,280 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.355 and weighted average of $52,949. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,447,957 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of $53,732, a difference of 1.5%.

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Pueblo ($52,930, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German ($52,888, a difference of 0.11%), Choctaw ($53,060, a difference of 0.21%), Hispanic or Latino ($52,832, a difference of 0.22%), and Spanish American Indian ($53,077, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois ($53,737, a difference of 0.010%), African ($53,711, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Barbados ($53,766, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute ($53,762, a difference of 0.060%), and Shoshone ($53,681, a difference of 0.090%).