Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Chickasaw
9.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
38.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
185th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,117,419 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 9.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 18.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 22.5% | 33.3% |
| Range | 20.8% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 10.1% | 12.7% |
| Median | 9.3% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are South American Indian (9.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Uruguayan (9.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Morocco (9.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Hmong (9.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and Colombian (9.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 47.1 /100 | #178 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 44.4 /100 | #179 | Average 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 43.4 /100 | #180 | Average 9.1% |
| Hmong | 40.2 /100 | #181 | Average 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 40.2 /100 | #182 | Average 9.1% |
| Uruguayans | 39.2 /100 | #183 | Fair 9.1% |
| South American Indians | 38.7 /100 | #184 | Fair 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 38.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 9.1% |
| Colombians | 36.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 9.2% |
| Delaware | 35.4 /100 | #187 | Fair 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 34.0 /100 | #188 | Fair 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 32.1 /100 | #189 | Fair 9.2% |
| Arabs | 31.5 /100 | #190 | Fair 9.2% |
| Ugandans | 28.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 9.3% |
| Spanish | 28.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |