Lithuanian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Lithuanian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
14.3%
POVERTY | BOYS < 16
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 407,717,575 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498 and weighted average of 14.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.8% in poverty level among boys under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lithuanians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lithuanians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 within an area, or if Lithuanians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Austrian (14.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Filipino (14.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (14.2%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Asia (14.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and Pakistani (14.4%, a difference of 0.70%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 86.9 /100 | #38 | Excellent 14.0% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 86.6 /100 | #39 | Excellent 14.0% |
| Immigrants from Northern Europe | 86.4 /100 | #40 | Excellent 14.1% |
| Immigrants from Bolivia | 86.3 /100 | #41 | Excellent 14.1% |
| Turks | 86.2 /100 | #42 | Excellent 14.1% |
| Immigrants from Sri Lanka | 85.8 /100 | #43 | Excellent 14.2% |
| Filipinos | 85.8 /100 | #44 | Excellent 14.2% |
| Lithuanians | 85.5 /100 | #45 | Excellent 14.3% |
| Austrians | 85.5 /100 | #46 | Excellent 14.3% |
| Immigrants from Asia | 85.1 /100 | #47 | Excellent 14.4% |
| Pakistanis | 85.1 /100 | #48 | Excellent 14.4% |
| Scandinavians | 85.1 /100 | #49 | Excellent 14.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 85.0 /100 | #50 | Excellent 14.4% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 84.9 /100 | #51 | Excellent 14.4% |
| Estonians | 84.9 /100 | #52 | Excellent 14.4% |
Lithuanian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian Data | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.080% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 21.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 21.2% | 95.7% |
| Mean | 6.4% | 29.2% |
| Median | 5.5% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.2% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 21.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 26.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 26.4% |
Correlation Details
| Lithuanian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.080% | 230,742,881 | 18.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 91,123,381 | 14.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 40,466,117 | 13.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 17,586,981 | 11.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 9,157,996 | 11.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 6,017,068 | 11.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.07% | 3,516,681 | 11.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 2,194,918 | 10.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 1,640,237 | 12.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 1,117,697 | 14.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 959,185 | 9.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 441,828 | 15.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 422,810 | 8.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 413,598 | 15.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 443,073 | 17.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 318,689 | 9.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 251,559 | 12.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 171,831 | 13.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.02% | 65,809 | 16.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 79,144 | 18.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 53,451 | 27.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.51% | 60,179 | 21.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 11,117 | 16.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.86% | 37,355 | 31.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.10% | 33,450 | 10.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 16,812 | 31.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.39% | 22,168 | 23.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.49% | 14,812 | 4.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 22,331 | 10.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.87% | 49,838 | 11.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.05% | 18,308 | 21.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.19% | 3,408 | 24.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.37% | 6,540 | 61.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.52% | 45,368 | 18.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.63% | 25,258 | 6.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 3,519 | 14.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 15,267 | 21.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 147 | 100.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.40% | 125 | 100.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.55% | 13,300 | 45.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.69% | 6,782 | 13.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.86% | 14,480 | 25.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 773 | 54.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.48% | 3,142 | 13.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.68% | 5,141 | 24.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.87% | 14,305 | 12.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.15% | 184 | 25.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.49% | 9,395 | 26.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.68% | 9,059 | 60.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.83% | 5,810 | 18.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.23% | 3,577 | 50.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.31% | 24,589 | 4.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.53% | 3,390 | 16.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.63% | 810 | 26.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.99% | 4,673 | 44.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.22% | 17,535 | 4.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 385 | 100.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.82% | 117 | 33.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.20% | 1,576 | 61.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.27% | 294 | 100.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.86% | 440 | 40.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.12% | 255 | 95.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.85% | 1,360 | 69.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.15% | 1,828 | 14.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.87% | 775 | 100.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.26% | 1,421 | 10.5% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.32% | 1,243 | 35.5% |